Bachelor
Digital Business and Innovation
Economics and Data Analytics
Economics and Politics
Finance
Industrial Technology Management
International Business and Communication
Business Management and Marketing
Master studies
Global Leadership and Strategy
Financial Economics
International Marketing and Management
Innovation and Technology Management
Doctoral
Economics
Management
Executive
Executive MBA
Executive Master
Education Leadership
Trainings
Research
Research areas
Researchers
Research projects
Publications
Research laboratories
Research for business
Baltic Journal of Management
News and events
Research Contacts
Lt
En
×
Bachelor
Master studies
Doctoral
Executive
Research
About ISM
For students
ISM alumni
Career center
ISM fund
International Studies Office
ISM Summer University in the Baltics
Library
News and events
COVID-19
Baltic Digital Skills Development Programme
Contacts
Connections to systems:
Doctoral Course Evaluation – Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Your Experience
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
Overall, how would you rate your experience with us?
How satisfied are you with
*
Very Unsatisfied
Unsatisfied
Neutral
Satisfied
Very Satisfied
1.The course was current and relevant
1.The course was current and relevant Very Unsatisfied
1.The course was current and relevant Unsatisfied
1.The course was current and relevant Neutral
1.The course was current and relevant Satisfied
1.The course was current and relevant Very Satisfied
2. The course was cohesive and logical
2. The course was cohesive and logical Very Unsatisfied
2. The course was cohesive and logical Unsatisfied
2. The course was cohesive and logical Neutral
2. The course was cohesive and logical Satisfied
2. The course was cohesive and logical Very Satisfied
3. Professor had deep knowledge in the subject
3. Professor had deep knowledge in the subject Very Unsatisfied
3. Professor had deep knowledge in the subject Unsatisfied
3. Professor had deep knowledge in the subject Neutral
3. Professor had deep knowledge in the subject Satisfied
3. Professor had deep knowledge in the subject Very Satisfied
4. Course material and readings were well selected
4. Course material and readings were well selected Very Unsatisfied
4. Course material and readings were well selected Unsatisfied
4. Course material and readings were well selected Neutral
4. Course material and readings were well selected Satisfied
4. Course material and readings were well selected Very Satisfied
5. Professor addressed my level and needs
5. Professor addressed my level and needs Very Unsatisfied
5. Professor addressed my level and needs Unsatisfied
5. Professor addressed my level and needs Neutral
5. Professor addressed my level and needs Satisfied
5. Professor addressed my level and needs Very Satisfied
6. Professor encouraged participation
6. Professor encouraged participation Very Unsatisfied
6. Professor encouraged participation Unsatisfied
6. Professor encouraged participation Neutral
6. Professor encouraged participation Satisfied
6. Professor encouraged participation Very Satisfied
7. How would you rate the value of the course for your dissertation writing process?
7. How would you rate the value of the course for your dissertation writing process? Very Unsatisfied
7. How would you rate the value of the course for your dissertation writing process? Unsatisfied
7. How would you rate the value of the course for your dissertation writing process? Neutral
7. How would you rate the value of the course for your dissertation writing process? Satisfied
7. How would you rate the value of the course for your dissertation writing process? Very Satisfied
8. How would you rate the value of the course for improving your research competences and skills?
8. How would you rate the value of the course for improving your research competences and skills? Very Unsatisfied
8. How would you rate the value of the course for improving your research competences and skills? Unsatisfied
8. How would you rate the value of the course for improving your research competences and skills? Neutral
8. How would you rate the value of the course for improving your research competences and skills? Satisfied
8. How would you rate the value of the course for improving your research competences and skills? Very Satisfied
9. What were the most useful aspects of the course?
*
10. What would you suggest for improving the course?
*
11. How are you satisfied with the course in general?
*
How can we improve?
*
We're sorry you did not have a good experience. Please let us know how we can do better.
Additional comments or suggestions
Submit
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.
More info about cookies
OK